Course Evaluation
-
For guidance in self-evaluation showing progression in competency, students can decide their own template but we propose different templates (see opposite figure): a 6 steps icons or a multilevel matrix. Not imposing deliberately one templates is part of the thinking in complexity paradigm.
The multilevel or six steps goes in line with the thinking in complexity paradigm and resonates with Kolb’s cycle (see Course method section): start knowing locally, then expand and later feel confident to practice externally in other context by adapting and inventing sustainable solutions.
-
Co-evaluation is done individually during the final interview, following a semi-structured method.
-
The reading of each portfolio by each of the four teachers lead to a written appreciation. Written evaluations are given to the students and merged into a grade at the final jury granting the diploma.